Indian Logic Forum

tantidharo · Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:29 am Post subject: La raison d'ГЄtre de Purusha

She has simply
retrofitted him the
incidental role of

priming implications towards
suspended disbeliefвЂ”an
irresolute figure of

atmospheric buzz without
which the film
appears too minimal,

too clean.

Matter self-lifting
off the hat
rack of being.

Oringinally published at bauddhamata.

Plamen · Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:29 am Post subject:

Nous devons dГ©finir d'abord la signification d'ГЄtre Г travers le Purusha. Smile

tantidharo · Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:08 pm Post subject:

Mon anglais est plus Г©tranger que le FranГ§ais ?

Plamen · Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:50 am Post subject:

Your English sounds like postmodern Latin to me. Smile

But I like learning new words.

BTW, the same question can be asked of Dharmakaya - what is the nature (svabhava) of being (Sein) of DharmakДЃya as compared to Puruб№Јa?

Assuming that Puruб№Јa is the "observational" raison d'ГЄtre of Prakб№›ti's evolution...

tantidharo

Welcome Rajendran.

Personally, I feel it has always been instructive as well as constructive to look at a number of same gender/species functions together vis-Г -vis purusha, brahman, dharma, and lately Plamen Gradinarov's inclusion of dharmakaya. Can we try to find a working compatibility between these? Can they all be lumped into a single manageable non-proprietary open source genera? I can't help think that it has been too long the obsessive aspiration of writerly males to produce such self-engendering textualities in the name of an amorphous female force, the analogue to which they seem awfully afraid of or appear at least intensely devoted to always ascribe subsidiary roles. Which is just the reason why I recently filmicly attempted to infer that our Venerable Purusha is after all nothing but a minor role/function/personae who either through daft directorial misinterpretation or deliberate maligning of a highly inexplicit plot, has usurped attention from the natural star and ascended to the throne of the chief protagonist. Which may also be the reason why we never seem to move beyond the point of an overbearing monomaniacal dramatis personae, because, as mentioned earlier, Purusha aint nothing but the nail in the wall upon which the great sliver screen is hung. However, ever since our earliest silent days, the unschooled critics have wholly misconstrued her (the screenwriter's) artefactual ploy to such an extent that it's always Purusha who skips away with the Oscar.

Re "lame purusha" -- Please refresh my memory.
________
swami spharananta bhikkhu (td harris)
oringinally published at http://bauddhamata.blogspot.com/2007/01/single-open-source-non-proprietary.html