 |
| Last Topics |
|
|
|
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bhadrakara

Age: 32 Gender:  Zodiac:  Joined: 30 Sep 2005 Posts: 18 Location: Moscow 235.29 points
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:18 am Post subject: Gangesa and Mathuranatha on Vyapti |
|
|
TOSHIHIRO WADA
GANGESA AND MATHURANATHA ON SIMHAVYAGHRALAKSANA OF VYAPTI
in: Journal of Indian Philosophy, August 1997
INTRODUCTION
The present article is a continuation of section IV of a previous article by the same title. This section contains a translation and analysis of the Simhavyaghralaksana chapter of Mathuranatha’s Tattvacintamanirahasya, which is a commentary on Gangesa’s Tattvacintamani. The content of the other sections is as follows:
In section I.2.I explained the relation among �definition’ (laksana), �definiendum’ (laksya), and invariable concomitance (vyapti) to such
an extent that readers can understand the discussions presented in the Tattvacintamani and the Tattvacintamanirahasya. Section II demonstrates
the method of illustrating the structures of the definitions of invariable concomitance. Sections III presents a translation and analysis of the Simhavyaghralaksan. a chapter of the Tattvacintamani. The following is a summary of the texts included in section III (a single text with no number), section IV (texts 1 to 3), and the present article which deals with texts 4 to 6. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mukund Dhaygude
Age: 50 Gender:  Zodiac:  Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 18
253.37 points
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject: Navya Nyaya |
|
|
One must look at the work of Cornelius Goekoop published in late 1970's as The Logic of Invariable concommittance in Gangesha's Tatvacintamani. He covers Vyaptivada and Anuman prakarana well. Staal has given the preface. The work of Guha also narrates it. BK Matilal also comments on it.
The scope of fire with respect to location and cause with extent of fire is an issue that he highlights. One must look at instrumental cause and material cause in the given boundary with P(Paksha) H(Hetu) and Sadhya(S). Do we construct a process of inference (anuman) from given P,H and S? Are direct H's enough to prove indirect S's ? How does one relate goals (i.e S's) that are backward chained ? Can we synthesize western and eastern logics ? Can we put it in object logics used in OOPs (Object Oriented Programming Systems ?
I guess many PhDs and post docs are worth these investigations. Any takers for these interdisciplinary researches with Navya Nyaya, Mathematics, Programming backgrounds ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|  |