Indian Logic Forum
 

Indian Logic Forum
Epistemology, Language and Metaphysics
Dedicated to B.K. Matilal
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   DownloadDownload   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Check your private messagesCheck your private messages   Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Navigation
Portal - About Us
NyДЃya-koЕ›a - Experts
My Watched Topics
Indian Logic - Links
  • Forum News
  • Projects
  • Indian Thought
  • Comparative
    Publications
  • Working Papers
  • Reviews
  • Library
    Nyaya Sastra
  • Pracina Nyaya
  • Navya Nyaya
  • Nyaya-Vaisesika
  • Terminology
    Methodology
  • Metaphysics
  • Epistemology
  • Soteriology
  • Nyaya & Yoga
  • Formal Methods
  • Applied Logic
    Debates
  • Buddhist Logic
  • Jaina Tarka
  • Mimamsa
  • Skepticism
    Special Theories
  • Object Theory
  • Theory of Negation
  • Theory of Error
  • Argumentatiom
    Language
  • Linguistics
  • Phil. of Language
  • Vyakarana
  • Sources
  • Wordshop
  • CS & LT
    Related Topics
  • Psychology
  • Aesthetics
  • Rhetoric
  • Science History
  • Culture Studies
    Weblogs - Gallery
    Archive

  • Last Topics
    » Curt retort to Candrakirti
    by tantidharo on Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:01 am

    » Fonts Required
    by tantidharo on Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:42 am

    » Indian Logic Knowledge Base
    by tantidharo on Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:01 am

    » Leda and the Swan
    by tantidharo on Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:15 am

    » Cultural Studies: two paradigms
    by tantidharo on Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:13 pm

    » On adopting a rule (Part I - Khuram's procedure)
    by khuram on Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:48 am

    » Nature of Science - Rational or Empirical…???
    by khuram on Wed Aug 29, 2007 11:21 am

    » The Chariot Analogy Predicament
    by Mary on Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:48 pm

    » um cannabalismo
    by tantidharo on Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:06 am

    » The Challenged Proprietarity of Thai Yoga
    by tantidharo on Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:41 pm


    Registration
    Username:

    Password:

     Remember me



    I forgot my password

    Don't have an account yet?
    You can register for FREE


    Oriental Top Sites

    Dharmakirti on Yogipratyaksa

     
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    Indian Logic Forum -> Buddhist Logic
    View previous topic :: View next topic  
    Author Message
    Bhadrakara



    Age: 32 Gender: Gender:Male
    Zodiac: Capricorn
    Joined: 30 Sep 2005
    Posts: 18
    Location: Moscow
    235.29 points

    PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:11 am    Post subject: Dharmakirti on Yogipratyaksa Reply with quote

    Jeson Woo
    DHARMAKДЄRTI AND HIS COMMENTATORS ON YOGIPRATYAKб№ўA

    Journal of Indian Philosophy
    vol. 31, pp. 439–448, 2003

    I
    In the Buddhist Pramāṇa school, perception (pratyakṣa) is one of the valid means of cognition (pramāṇa). It is defined as free from conceptual construction (kalpanāpoḍha) and non-erroneous (abhrānta). Dignāga (ca. 480–540), the founder of this school, divides perception into fourfold: sense-perception (indriyajñāna), mental cognition (mānasajñāna), selfconsciousness (svasaṃvedana), and the cognition of yogins (yogijñāna).

    Among them, the cognition of yogins is the intuition of a thing in itself unassociated with the teacher’s instruction. As one of the most difficult concepts in Buddhist philosophy, this cognition is essential to prove the property of the omniscient being (sarvajña) of the Buddha.

    Since Dharmakīrti (ca. 600–660), who succeeded and developed the teaching of Dignāga, elaborated yogic intuition (yogijñāna) in his works, it has been a crucial topic of heated debate between the Buddhist Pramāṇa and the Hindu Mīmāṃsā schools. Evolving over some five centuries of creative philosophical activity (7th–11th), it plays a conspicuous and significant role in the works of the philosophers belonging to these schools. An important issue under discussion with regard to the cognition of yogins is how it fulfills the above-mentioned twofold definition of perception. The aim of my article is to investigate its epistemological structure in Dharmakīrti’s works, such as the Pramāṇa-vārttika and the Nyāya-bindu. In addition, I shall examine the debate on this cognition between his commentators, such as Dharmottara (ca. 750–810) and Prajñākaragupta (about the end of the 8th–the middle of the 9th), and their Hindu counterparts.

    II
    The cognition of yogins results through the practice of meditation (bhДЃvanДЃ). It is divested of the snares of judgement (vikalpa) and is characterized as vivid manifestation (viЕ›adДЃbhДЃ). In the NyДЃyabindu, DharmakД«rti defines this cognition as follows when he enumerates it among the category of perception...
    Back to top
    View user's profile Send private message
    Display posts from previous:   
    Post new topic   Reply to topic    Indian Logic Forum -> Buddhist Logic All times are GMT
    Page 1 of 1


     
    Jump to:  
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum
    You cannot attach files in this forum
    You cannot download files in this forum


    Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group